The Practice of Adoption

by teradanielle

Re-post from Dr. Linda Kats with Carri and Camden on my mind.  To view original go here.

“Are you pregnant, scared, with no one to talk to? We can help you with finances, medical expenses and secure a great home for your baby. There are many loving families who can provide a stable home with all the advantages for a child.” 

This message simulates the messages that lure mothers who find themselves in an unplanned pregnancy. A “loving and right” choice offers the mom a way of “redeeming” herself in this untimely circumstance. Unfortunately, while the websites and billboards of adoption agencies make adoption sound like a panacea for solving the dilemma of an unplanned pregnancy, the details of the future fail to surface in the information before a decision is made.

A family is chosen and programming reinforced of all the “right and loving” messages that follow such an “unselfish” decision. While these statements ring true before all the negotiations have completed and before the baby has been born, it is the time after the birth that has not been truthfully and forcefully presented in concert with the other information given.

Story after story continuously surfaces of the trauma of placing a child in an adoption. The trauma affects the natural mom first because the mom is developmentally able to verbalize or communicate the pain, the fear, the overwhelming urge to know how her baby is and what is happening with her baby. The baby, however, must live a life without being able to fully embrace the God-like decision making that took him or her from a familiar human with whom s/he bonded for nine months to a family of strangers.

What ethical considerations must adoption agencies and adoption representatives establish to know that an adoption is happening in the best interest of all parties but particularly for the baby with no voice? How can a prospective adoptive family know an agency is ethical and truly completing adoptions that are win/win placements?

These thought provoking questions necessarily evoke an emotional response. No one wants to believe that a child placed for adoption really didn’t need a new family. No one wants to believe that a natural mother ever relinquishes a child and regrets it the rest of her life. Nor does anyone want to believe that the mother didn’t go on with her life like she was promised she would do. After all, she will know her baby is cared for and healthy. Why should she give another thought to the child she carried for 9 months, labored to birth, or survived a c-section to give life?

Adoption loss does not establish a reason to celebrate. The idea of celebrating the loss of family because another family is gaining that lost member doesn’t compute. And yet, how many adoption celebrations happen everyday? Does adoption create a home for a child without a home, absolutely! The adoptions that occur when a child already has a home and a family are suspect from the beginning. The agency ads, billboards, and other social media preying on the emotions of a circumstantially marginalized population seems inhumane.

Celebrate life, celebrate family. Adopt a family by adding to the family, not by taking away. Turn this social phenomena around by helping families and supporting those children within the family.